Capacity, Quality and Market Risks Highlighted
The Pelagic Association said the real challenges lie in the capacity of land-based facilities, differences in vessel equipment, the condition of live crab on landing, and future demand and price development.
It warned that forcing all vessels, including those not properly equipped for live handling, to deliver 20% of their individual quotas as live crab could result in lower quality product entering the market. In 2026 alone, this would mean around 1,558 tonnes of live snow crab being delivered by vessels unable to guarantee optimal quality.
When combined with the 38% expected from specialist live vessels, the association estimates that close to 50% of the total quota could be delivered live if the regulation remains unchanged.
“That level of volume, delivered over a short season, could overwhelm processing capacity and damage export quality,” the association said, adding that this would ultimately harm both vessel owners and the land-based industry.
Response to Finnmark Municipalities’ Position
The Pelagic Association also responded to an article published by Fiskeribladet on 26 January, which cited statements from 16 Finnmark municipalities and the West and East Finnmark Councils. Those bodies said they were satisfied that a live snow crab allocation had been introduced and described the 20% level as “a good start”.
However, the Pelagic Association said the municipalities focused on the quantity of live crab landed in Finnmark, not on the regulatory mechanics. It noted that the current system allocates live quotas at vessel level as an additional requirement, rather than allowing the quota to be fished collectively.
Both the municipalities and the Pelagic Association agree, it said, that live crab must be landed alive and in good condition, and that export quality will influence future demand and prices.
Risk of Perverse Incentives
One consequence of the current regulation, the association warned, is that some operators who want to specialise in live crab could instead shift towards frozen production to avoid operational and quality risks. Such an outcome, it said, would run directly counter to the stated aim of strengthening land-based processing and value creation.
Against this backdrop, the Pelagic Association has asked the ministry to amend the 2026 regulations as a matter of urgency.
Proposed Regulatory Changes
The association’s preferred option is to retain the 20% live allocation but allow it to be fished at group level. Under this model, frozen fishing would stop once 80% of the total quota is taken, while live-focused vessels continue to supply the market.
Alternatively, it has proposed a quota exchange scheme for 2026. This would allow vessels geared for frozen production to exchange their additional live quota with vessels that only deliver live crab, effectively redistributing obligations within the fleet.
The Pelagic Association said such a system could help both fishermen and processors avoid logistical bottlenecks, particularly if close to 6,000 tonnes of live crab were to be delivered simultaneously.
Urgency Ahead of 2026 Season
With the snow crab season already under way, the association said rapid regulatory clarification is essential to provide predictability for vessel owners and the land-based industry.
It added that it is available to assist the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Fisheries with revised regulatory wording if requested.