Proposal Developed From Harbour-Level Consultation
Desmond outlined how the proposal emerged from repeated discussions with fishermen across coastal communities over the past two years.
Fishermen have experienced continuous quota losses from annual negotiations, major increases in operating costs — fuel, bait, insurance and maintenance — severe price volatility, and a drastic reduction in safe fishing days due to weather.
He told the Committee that a common message was heard in every harbour: “We are not going broke in one year — we are slowly being squeezed out.”
According to Desmond, NIFA examined agricultural support models and climate adaptation policy before developing what it calls a Basic Income Stabilisation Payment and Climate Compensation model.
“We looked at agriculture supports. We looked at weather loss in farming. We looked at climate adaptation policy. And we asked why a primary food producer at sea has no income stabilisation mechanism at all,” he said.
He stressed that the proposal is “not as a subsidy, but as a stabiliser to stop collapse.”
Economics No Longer Add Up
Desmond told the Committee that the economics of inshore fishing “no longer add up.”
“A skipper can invest €200,000–€400,000 in a small boat and gear, work full-time, land high-quality food — and still earn less than minimum wage in a bad year,” he said.
He warned that crews are leaving the sector not because they want to, but because income has become too unpredictable to sustain family life.
“We are now regularly losing up to 80–100 fishing days per year to climate-driven conditions,” Desmond said.
At the same time, bait prices are becoming unsustainable, small boats cannot diversify due to closed fisheries, young people cannot secure loans because income is unpredictable, and older fishermen are exiting early with no replacement generation.
“This is no longer a profitability issue — it is now a continuity issue. Once an inshore fleet disappears, it cannot be rebuilt,” he warned.
Impact on Coastal Communities
Desmond argued that the consequences extend beyond the boats themselves.
“This sector is not just about fishermen,” he said, noting that every fishing job supports multiple onshore jobs in transport, processing, marine services and local businesses.
He cautioned that if the inshore fleet contracts significantly, coastal towns will not feel a slowdown but “a structural economic loss”, adding that unlike many industries, these jobs cannot relocate inland.
Call for State Intervention
Desmond insisted that NIFA is not seeking wealth creation but basic income stability.
“We are not asking the State to make fishermen wealthy. We are asking the State to recognise that a climate-exposed primary food sector cannot operate with zero income stability while every comparable sector has support mechanisms,” he said.
He described the proposal as “a stabilisation framework designed to keep fishermen fishing, keep coastal communities functioning, and keep domestic food production alive.”
Without intervention, he warned, “the decline of the inshore fleet will not be sudden, but it will be permanent.”