The MMO has responded news that Greenpeace intends to carry out more boulder dumps at sea in the South West Deeps

The Cornish fishing industry has reacted to the actions of Greenpeace who have been boulder dumping in the South West Deeps.  Photo: Greenpeace

The Cornish Fish Producers’ Organisation has reacted to the actions of Greenpeace who have been dumping boulders in marine conservation zone.

In mid-August this year, Greenpeace dumped boulder in the MCZ of the South West Deeps, approximately 200 kilometres off Land’s End, Cornwall. It had planned another round of dumping last week but under orders from the Marine Management Organisation, Poole Harbour Commissioners blocked their vessel, the ‘Arctic Sunrise’ from loading boulder onboard at the harbour.

Greenpeace’s actions have been called reckless endangerment by the fishing industry, but has been hailed by smug second rate attention seeking celebrities who are only there to get there face on the telly.

the fishing daily advertise with us

After their defeat on Thursday 08 September, Greenpeace tweeted, “The government has blocked Greenpeace activists from protecting UK oceans. They’ve threatened the port authority with legal action if they let us pick up a new shipment of boulders. Why are they wasting public time and money going after ocean defenders?”

Unortunately, for Greenpeace they have done very little to protect the ocean, instead creating new habitats for alien species to invade and putting the lives of fishermen at risk as boulders are not permanent fixtures on the ocean floor. The fishing industry has called on Greenpeace to stop their actions and to work with themselves and the scientific community so that safe and sustainable fishing can be achieved. Instead, Greenpeace are hell-bent on destroying the reputation of the fishing industry, and are using a judgement in Newcastle Crown Court last February to justify their actions.

Reacting to the Greenpeace campaign the CFPO has given “Five Reason why Boulders are not the way to Manage our Fisheries and the Marine Environment”. In their post they say:

With Greenpeace’s illegal, celebrity-tagged, boulder-dumping mission still simmering in the media, it is an important time to have a reality check. Whilst not wanting to overly engage in the headline-grabbing media campaign, the below statement sets out the facts and perspectives of the Cornish fishing industry.

Here are our five reasons why dumping boulders in the ocean is not the way to manage our fisheries and the marine environment:

  1. It endangers the lives of hard-working fishermen.

Fishing is already the most dangerous job in the UK. Hard-working skippers and their crew, which are fishing legally to provide food for the nation, do not need additional hazards when working 200 miles offshore, or anywhere for that matter. The South West Deeps is exposed to huge swells and tidal movement, meaning that boulders of any size will not remain static in this environment and are now a moving hazard for all fishermen.

  1. It is illegal and does not follow the evidence.

It is not right that Greenpeace can break marine licensing regulations by illegally dumping boulders, whilst fishermen and all other marine users are expected to comply. The Marine Management Organisation is currently working with all stakeholders to review management measures of fishing activity impacts within multiple Marine Protected Areas around the UK coastline. A call for evidence was recently completed, which will shape the future management of these sites. This is coupled with a consultation on the introduction of Highly Protected Marine Areas, which is currently live. These two consultations provide the opportunity to engage legally and meaningfully, which the fishing industry has done and will continue to do. Working with science, policy, and the law is the way to best manage the marine environment.

  1. It creates displacement and unintended consequences.

Stopping fishing activity in one area will simply transfer it into another and increase competition for space. With an ever-growing demand for space in the marine environment, fishing does not need to be squeezed anymore. As well as creating spatial matters, it will also result in vessels having to burn additional fuel to move to other fishing grounds, which would be detrimental to the environment that Greenpeace claim to be protecting.

  1. It creates mixed messages to the public.

Fishing provides a low-carbon source of highly nutritious protein, it also sustains many of our coastal communities. Demonising parts of the fishing fleet negatively affects the wider industry and surrounding communities, including those that Greenpeace say they are protecting.

  1. It leaves no space for collaboration

As stated above, throwing boulders into the ocean is just plain ineffective. Whilst it attracts celebrities and headlines, this type of illegal activism ultimately leads to multiple negative economic, environmental and social consequences.

The most effective way to manage our fisheries and the marine environment is through good science, evidence, technology, and collaboration between all stakeholders. It is in this space that the fishing industry is firmly positioned, and will remain, to ensure there is a sustainable fishing industry, healthy marine ecosystem, and vibrant, thriving coastal communities in the future

Follow The Fishing Daily

Cornish fishing reacts to Greenpeace’s boulder dumping in South West Deeps

by editor time to read: 7 min