The STECF had previously warned that the research plan did not clearly state its objectives, lacked added scientific value, and risked undermining depleted stocks, particularly salmon populations from the vulnerable Ljungan River.
Despite repeated Commission requests to suspend the operation until further assessment, Finland proceeded with the fishery in May and June 2024, arguing it was compliant with EU law and necessary for gathering biological data on salmon origin. Finnish officials also rejected the need for a second STECF opinion, citing timing constraints and legal interpretations.
The Commission, however, stood firm in its conclusion that the scientific research could have been conducted with fewer vessels, using alternative methods that did not require the killing of wild salmon. Citing survivability rates of over 70% for trap-netted salmon, Brussels argued that a live-release protocol could have fulfilled the research objectives while minimising impact.
As a result of the overfishing, the deduction will be applied in full to Finland’s 2025 Atlantic salmon quota, which was originally set at 8,989 individuals. No additional penalties beyond a one-to-one deduction were deemed necessary, as the catch volume fell below 100 tonnes.
The case underscores growing tensions between national fisheries management strategies and EU conservation standards, especially concerning the protection of threatened salmon populations in the Baltic Sea.
The regulation is binding in its entirety and applicable across all EU Member States.