EU Parliament backs tougher sanctions against unsustainable fishing, giving Commission new powers to confront non-EU overfishing
The European Parliament has voted overwhelmingly in favour of new measures targeting non-EU countries accused of enabling unsustainable fishing practices in waters shared with the EU.
With 681 votes in favour, just four against and four abstentions, MEPs have approved updated rules that increase the EU’s ability to apply sanctions, including trade-related measures such as import bans, against third countries that allow overfishing or refuse to cooperate on fisheries management.
Clearer Legal Grounds for Sanctions
The revised regulation outlines specific examples of what constitutes a “failure to cooperate”. These include refusal to consult with the EU, delaying responses to requests, or introducing discriminatory quotas. It also covers failures to implement, adopt, or enforce fishery management measures—either under direct agreements with the EU or within Regional Fisheries Management Organisations (RFMOs).
The new rules provide clarity on the scientific standards third countries must meet. In particular, third countries managing shared fish stocks are now expected to follow the “best available scientific advice” and demonstrate active cooperation in stock management.
According to the Parliament, the regulation enhances legal certainty for enforcement while giving the European Commission broader authority to intervene. For fish stocks managed under RFMOs, the EU must first seek resolution through the relevant organisation before escalating to unilateral measures.
Third Countries Given 90-Day Response Window
The legislation introduces a 90-day deadline for non-EU countries to respond after being identified as non-cooperating. This is intended to accelerate resolution and prevent prolonged disputes, particularly for stocks where EU fleets are economically reliant.
MEPs Say EU Must Defend Its Fishing Interests
The regulation was spearheaded by rapporteur Thomas Bajada (S&D, Malta), who said the move was necessary to protect the interests of European fishermen.
“Fishers have for so long felt unheard in their concerns, and this proposal is our answer. We have delivered a stronger EU response to those who undermine our fishers and our marine resources,” Bajada said.
The regulation now awaits final confirmation from the EU Council. Once formally adopted, it will enter into force 20 days after publication in the Official Journal.
Background: Rarely Used but Increasingly Necessary
The previous regulation, adopted in 2008, has only been invoked once—against the Faroe Islands in 2013—resulting in a one-year EU ban on herring and mackerel imports. That episode, which led to diplomatic tensions and eventual resolution, highlighted the EU’s limited leverage under outdated rules.
This new version aims to rectify that by providing a more agile and enforceable framework.
The EU shares many fish stocks with non-member countries, including Norway and the UK. Stocks in the Mediterranean and Black Sea are mostly managed through the General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean (GFCM), while bilateral or trilateral arrangements cover northern waters.
The Parliament believes these measures are essential to enforce sustainable fishing rules and maintain a level playing field for EU fleets.
Source: Press Release