EAPO criticises European Commission’s fisheries control regulation consultation, citing poor timing, added burdens, and lack of stakeholder inclusion
The European Association of Fish Producers Organisations (EAPO) has accused the European Commission of undermining stakeholder engagement with its rushed consultation on the Fisheries Control Regulation Implementing Act, due to apply from January 2026.
Short Consultation Period Criticised
In its official submission, EAPO highlighted what it called a “major concern” over the four-week consultation window launched in the middle of the summer holiday period. The association stated that the timing “excludes de facto full participation in the process,” making it impossible for organisations representing multiple Member States and fisheries to properly consult their members before responding.
The group said this runs counter to the principle of public consultation and represents “an unacceptable limitation on stakeholder engagement.”
Increased Burdens Without Clear Purpose
EAPO warned that the amended control rules, combined with new delegated and implementing acts, would “introduce additional layers of complexity, additional cost for operators as well as increased administrative burden.”
It stressed that in many cases “the purpose of the additional or revised rules is not clearly specified,” raising doubts about the practical application and enforceability of the measures. The association emphasised that fishermen are already under pressure from a complex regulatory regime and should not be expected to shoulder more requirements without justification.
Traceability, Weighing and Data Concerns
Among the most pressing technical issues raised were rules on traceability, vessel position data, weighing procedures, and margins of tolerance. EAPO argued that these elements could further complicate compliance without demonstrable benefits, warning that uncertainty and inconsistency in implementation could weaken trust in the system.
The organisation stressed that control regulations should serve the purpose of sustainability and accountability, but not at the cost of imposing disproportionate burdens on the sector.
Call for Inclusive Dialogue
EAPO said it remains committed to constructive dialogue, but only if the Commission changes its approach. The group called for “a more comprehensive and inclusive process” involving close collaboration with both Member States and stakeholders.
According to EAPO, this would allow for “fruitful cooperation” and ensure that the regulation can be implemented in a way that is workable for those operating at sea while still meeting sustainability objectives.
