Danish Organisation Sets Out Detailed CFP Overhaul Proposal
The Danish Fishers Producer Organisation has set out a detailed proposal for reform of the Common Fisheries Policy, centred on reducing regulatory micromanagement and replacing it with a results-based system tied to full documentation.
The proposals were presented to Costas Kadis in Brussels by Kenn Skau Fischer, representing the organisation.
Kenn Skau Fischer said, “Today I had the pleasure of meeting EU Commissioner Kadis in Bruxelles and on behalf of Danish Fishers PO giving him the recipe for a EU Fisheries Policy (CFP) that makes sense.”
He added, “We need an result-based approach to the fisheries policy. Fishers that operates under full documentation and is held accountable for his or her activity shall have freedom to to choose fishing gear and not bothered by micro-management.”
Results-Based System Linked to Full Documentation
The organisation’s proposal centres on shifting away from detailed technical rules towards a system where fisherman are judged on outcomes rather than prescribed methods.
It states that vessels operating under full documentation, including electronic monitoring and CCTV, should be allowed greater operational freedom, particularly in relation to gear choice and fishing practices.
Under this model, vessels would be required to document catches, fishing locations and gear use, with electronic systems providing independent verification of compliance.
The organisation states that this would allow operators to adapt to fishing conditions and quotas while remaining accountable for environmental and regulatory requirements.
Micromanagement and “One Size Fits All” Rules Criticised
The organisation states that the current CFP relies on highly detailed regulations covering gear design, technical measures and control systems, which it describes as burdensome for the fishing sector.
It highlights what it describes as a “one size fits all” approach, where uniform rules are applied regardless of regional differences in fisheries.
It also states that Member States are limited in their ability to introduce more flexible or adaptive measures, restricting innovation and preventing case-by-case approaches.




